D.C. Circuit· 6/27/2006

United States v. Sullivan, Roger

Citations

451 F.3d 884
371 U.S. App. D.C. 369
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16081
2006 WL 1735889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the application of § 2252A to the intrastate possession of child pornography does not exceed Congress’s Commerce Clause authority
involving the question whether a court-imposed ban on internet use as a condition of supervised release fits the broad statutory goals enumerated in § 3583
affirming sentence where defendant did not contemporaneously object to district court’s “fail[ure] to substantiate the conditions of release” and did not advance any “viable basis for ascribing plain error to” sentencing judge
rejecting a belated challenge to supervised release conditions “because there is no showing here that the judge would have imposed less onerous conditions even if [defendant] had been afforded ‘advance’ notice”
reviewing for plain error where defendant and his lawyer “sat in court while the judge pronounced the sentence, but they never voiced an objection on the ground that the District Court had failed to substantiate the conditions of release”
“every time one user downloads an image, he simultaneously produces a duplicate version of that image”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Brown, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.