United States v. Ronald C. Forrest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that we review rulings on admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion
• observing that we review rulings on admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion
• upholding the constitutionality of criminalizing intrastate production and possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251 (a), 2252A(a)(5)(b
• conducting a plain error review of a Commerce Clause challenge that was not raised before the district court
• rejecting defendant’s claim, pursuant to Raich, that he could not be prosecuted under the commerce power for purely intrastate production of child pornography
• “[Prohibiting the possession and viewing of child pornography will ... help[ ] to protect the victims of child pornography and to eliminate the market for the exploitative use of children.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).