Skip to main content
· 5/27/2010

United States v. Blinkinsop

Citations

  • 606 F.3d 1110
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10829
  • 2010 WL 2105181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating blanket prohibition and remanding for the district court to consider tailoring the restriction to allow access based on permission from the probation officer
  • noting “with approval” that special conditions limiting interaction with children for a defendant convicted of a child pornography crime “can be tailored” by requiring permission of the probation officer
  • upholding a 97-month sentence as reasonable for receipt of child pornography
  • “A district judge need not state at sentencing the reasons for imposing each condition of supervised release, if it is apparent from the record.”
  • probation officer’s discretion can alleviate the harshness of a condition on loitering where children congre- gate
  • “[W]hen a district judge imposes a sentence within the Guidelines range, ‘it is probable that the sentence is reasonable,’ because the judge’s application of the § 3653(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hawkins, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.