United States v. Timothy Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the request for substitution of counsel made one and a half months prior to trial was untimely
• noting that the defendant “waited until just prior to trial to raise” his dissatisfaction with counsel
• stating that “channels of interstate commerce” were “utilized” where defendant sent illicit images over the internet
• finding that the request for substitution of counsel made one and a half months prior to trial was untimely
• holding district court’s inquiry adequate where defendant was given opportunity to explain alleged conflict and counsel “was also given an opportunity to respond and gave a detailed explanation of the history of his representation” of the defendant
• finding no unfair prejudice where a police officer read portions of a defendant’s previously admitted diary to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).