United States v. Karl P. Zinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that supervised release sentences are normally reviewed for abuse of discretion
• determining that imprisoned appellant's challenge to polygraph testing requirement as a condition of supervised release was \neither premature nor speculative\ because he would be subject to the challenged condition upon his release from prison
• stating that supervised-release sentences are reviewed for abuse of discretion
• acknowledging “the vital role probation officers fulfill in effectuating the district court’s sentence”
• doing the same when reviewing a First Amendment challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).