Skip to main content
· 2/28/2012

United States v. Marc Accardi

Citations

  • 399 U.S. App. D.C. 283
  • 669 F.3d 340
  • 2012 WL 614809
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding appeal waiver not knowing and intelligent when no colloquy regarding appeal waiver occurred at Rule 11 hearing
  • upholding a qualified ban on the defendant's ability to access the Internet after conviction for sex crimes
  • \[A] question of first impression ... would be inappropriate to address under plain error review.\
  • \[A] question of first impression ... would be inappropriate to address under plain error review.\
  • “Nowhere did he indicate his willingness to accept the sentence he now challenges....”
  • defendant used internet to distribute child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Brown, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.