Ninth Circuit· 5/30/1989

United States v. Stephen J. Eide

Citations

875 F.2d 1429
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an interrogation conducted in familiar surroundings weighs against a finding that the defendant was in custody
holding that because the FBI agents interviewed defendant at his home and the meeting was amicable, the agents were not required to administer Miranda warnings
\The rationale behind [ 42 U.S.C. § 290dd-2 ] is to encourage people with drug or alcohol problems to seek treatment\
all indicating that interrogations occurring at a defendant’s residence are a factor in finding a defendant is not in custody
the telling of a \parable\ by one of two FBI agents in defendant's home, which was designed to induce feelings of remorse, did not establish custody
brief interview of suspect at his home was not custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Tang, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.