United States v. Brobst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that questioning of “two minutes or so” weighs against custody
• indicating that questioning of “two minutes or so” weighs against custody
• applying the Court’s holding in Moore to sei- zures of property
• applying the Court’s hold- ing in Moore to seizures of property
• remanding with instruc- tions that the district court vacate one of Brobst’s convictions for either receipt or possession of child pornography, allowing for it to be reinstated without prejudice if his other conviction should be overturned on direct or collateral review
• remanding with instruc- tions that the district court vacate one of Brobst’s convictions for either receipt or possession of child pornography, allowing for it to be reinstated without prejudice if his other conviction should be overturned on direct or collateral review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).