Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Colorado Court of Appeals· 10/16/2008

People v. Jimenez

Citations

  • 217 P.3d 841
  • 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1435
  • 2008 WL 4592128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even potential wrongdoing by the prosecutor is not sufficient to automatically disqualify the district attorney
  • “Under the circumstances, these brief, isolated statements, even if erroneously admitted, did not affect defendant's substantial rights.”
  • “Under the circumstances, these brief, isolated statements, even if erroneously admitted, did not affect defendant’s substantial rights.”
  • “[T]he rules of evidence reflect a liberal approach to the admissibility of expert testimony.”
  • the usefulness of testimony, for purposes of relevance, “hinges on whether there is a logical relation between the proffered testimony and the factual issues involved in the case.” (quoting People v. Ramirez, 155 P.3d 371, 379 (Colo. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.