Seventh Circuit· 4/14/1987

United States v. Joseph E. Hornick

Citations

815 F.2d 1156
22 Fed. R. Serv. 1611
1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

the fact that federal warrant was authorized by a state rather than federal judge did not call for exclusion of evidence seized
district court is without authority to award credit for custody prior to the commencement of the sentence
the fact that federal warrant was authorized by a state rather than federal judge did not call for exclusion of evidence seized
“[I]t is difficult to antic- ipate any violation of Rule 41, short of a defect that also offends the Warrant Clause of the fourth amendment, that would call for suppression.”
judge’s direction to BOP is merely an advisory opinion
judge's direction to BOP is merely an advisory opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Flaum, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.