United States v. Joseph E. Hornick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that federal warrant was authorized by a state rather than federal judge did not call for exclusion of evidence seized
• district court is without authority to award credit for custody prior to the commencement of the sentence
• the fact that federal warrant was authorized by a state rather than federal judge did not call for exclusion of evidence seized
• “[I]t is difficult to antic- ipate any violation of Rule 41, short of a defect that also offends the Warrant Clause of the fourth amendment, that would call for suppression.”
• judge’s direction to BOP is merely an advisory opinion
• judge's direction to BOP is merely an advisory opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).