Skip to main content
· 3/26/1991

United States v. Lorenzo Osorio

Citations

  • 929 F.2d 753
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4821
  • 1991 WL 39722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that standard of review for delayed disclosure under Ingraldi is essentially one of prejudice
  • noting, as alternative remedies, recalling witness for additional cross-examination, affording defense greater leeway with witnesses, and instructing jury that government failed to meet discovery obligations
  • finding no nexus between the alleged misconduct and any prejudice to the defendant
  • approving reasonable restrictions by trial court on repetitive, harassing, unduly prejudicial, irrelevant, or other- wise improper cross-examination
  • noting, as alternative remedies, recalling witness for additional cross-examination, affording defense greater leeway with witnesses, and instructing jury that govern- ment failed to meet discovery obligations
  • denying mitigating role adjustment where defendant's participation not less than average participation in crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Bownes, Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.