United States v. Rivera-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the case against the defendant was not strong and thus “[w]ithout [the judge’s] improper interventions, there is a reasonable probability that [the defendant] would not have been convicted”
• finding serious prejudice where the judge's interventions in witness testimony \created the impression that the court favored the government's version of events\
• referring to the second prong as the \serious prejudice\ test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).