United States v. Pires

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the jury took a recording that included the accurate statement that the government had misquoted during its argument into the jury room
• finding that departure from precedent is warranted “where the previous holding is contradicting by controlling authority, subsequently announced”
• noting that “individual reactions to pain are subjective and not 2 easily determined by reference to objective measurements”
• noting that the “likelihood of harm” from prosecutor’s misrepresentation of recording “was minuscule” because the recording “was introduced into evidence, and the jury took it into the jury room”
• finding that a plaintiff fails allege a disability under the 14 ADA if he “has failed to allege that his condition[] substantially limited him in his 15 performance of a major life activity”
• applying Lewis's holding to a § 2252(a)(2) charge where a video file was transmitted over the Internet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).