Seventh Circuit· 11/24/2008

United States v. Singleton

Citations

548 F.3d 589
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 24063
2008 WL 4964798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that despite a two to four month temporal gap, “the uncharged conduct involved the same principal, the same location, and same drug-facts that render it similar enough” to show “an ongoing pattern of conduct”
upholding implicit relevant conduct finding under clear error review where court adopted the PSR’s findings that detailed the defendant’s regular history of drug sales over a six-year span
district court properly concluded that uncharged sales of same drug at same location were relevant conduct based on defendant’s testimony and PSR
district court properly concluded that uncharged sales of same drug at same location were relevant conduct based on defendant’s testimony and PSR

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Singleton

56 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.