United States v. Lee Roy Mullins, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying restitution for legal fees incurred in an effort to recover equipment taken through fraud
• finding an absence of regular- ity where the uncharged conduct comprised one prior scheme to defraud several life insurance companies
• uncharged conduct occurring six months prior to charged conduct did not occur within temporal proximity
• similarity, regularity, and temporal proximity test for both common scheme or plan and same course of conduct reviewed for clear error when district court makes factual finding
• temporal proximity factor “extremely weak . . . if present at all, as the uncharged conduct took place over six months prior to the two phone calls underlying the offense of conviction”
• court should consider similarity, regular- ity, and temporal proximity of offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).