United States v. Vladimir Cedano-Rojas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that whether a transaction forms part of the same course of conduct as the offense of conviction depends on the similarity, regularity and temporal proximity of the incidents in question
• finding a sufficient connection between prior drug transactions and the conduct of conviction despite a two-year gap between the offenses
• government bears burden of proving defendant’s connection with drugs included in calculation by a preponderance of the evidence
• transactions involved the same, persons, similar amounts of cocaine, same location and similar method of delivery
• testimony of one biased witness may be sufficient to support a finding of fact
• testimony relating to earlier transactions consistent with the defendant’s tape-recorded statements referencing earlier transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).