Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 6/28/2011

United States v. Johnson

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 545
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13130
  • 2011 WL 2547616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remand is necessary to consider the defendant’s argument regarding the crack/powder disparity even when the court sentenced the defendant below the guidelines range
  • re- manding because the district judge did not implicitly or ex- plicitly consider the defendant’s principal mitigating argu- ment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.