United States v. Roger D. Zehm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[drug] purchases predating convicted sales may be considered relevant conduct”
• upholding credibility determination because witness’s testimony was consistent with the testi- mony of other witnesses and defendant
• upholding credibility determination because witness’s testimony was consistent with the testi- mony of other witnesses and defendant
• upholding credibility determination because witness’s testimony was consistent with the testi- mony of other witnesses and defendant
• comparing the “distinct No. 15‐1568 Page 5 concepts” of the “common scheme or plan” and “same course of conduct” formulations
• withholding acceptance of respon‐ sibility reduction when the defendant denied responsibility for the full extent of his involvement in the charged conspiracy in a statement at odds with witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).