Ninth Circuit· 12/30/2004
United States v. Robert S. Gordon
Citations
- 393 F.3d 1044
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27182
- 2004 WL 3015422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when determining restitution in securities fraud cases, it is appropriate for “district courts to place the risk of downward' fluctuations in stock prices on defendants rather than victims”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Paez, Clifton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Second Circuit· 2006-04-18· cited 253×
- United States v. WaknineNinth Circuit· 2008-09-10· cited 214×
- United States v. MarksNinth Circuit· 2008-06-13· cited 203×
- United States v. BiblerNinth Circuit· 2007-07-19· cited 192×
- United States v. Francis BoccagnaSecond Circuit· 2006-06-13· cited 138×
- Lagos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2018-05-29· cited 112×
- United States v. BeydounFifth Circuit· 2006-10-24· cited 107×
- United States v. MorelandNinth Circuit· 2010-09-17· cited 98×
- United States v. Richard I. Berger, United States of America v. Richard I. BergerNinth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 95×
- United States v. Tommie HuffEleventh Circuit· 2010-06-25· cited 82×
- United States v. AmatoSecond Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 79×
- United States v. Henry LoNinth Circuit· 2016-10-05· cited 76×
- United States v. Gerald GreenNinth Circuit· 2013-07-11· cited 74×
- United States v. Walter Kevin ScottSeventh Circuit· 2005-04-25· cited 69×
- United States v. Letantia Bussell, United States of America v. Letantia BussellNinth Circuit· 2005-07-12· cited 64×
- United States v. NosalNinth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 64×
- United States v. KennedyNinth Circuit· 2011-07-11· cited 61×
- United States v. Brock-DavisNinth Circuit· 2007-10-02· cited 61×
- United States v. YeungNinth Circuit· 2012-02-13· cited 55×
- United States v. Margaret Ann GordonTenth Circuit· 2007-03-28· cited 55×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 3,761×
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 871×
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of IndiaSupreme Court· 1978-02-27· cited 206×
- United States v. Charlene Hoyle, United States of America v. Cheryl McCullough BentonFourth Circuit· 1994-09-01· cited 195×
- United States v. BaramdykaNinth Circuit· 1996-09-10· cited 149×
- United States v. Jerry D. SmithNinth Circuit· 1991-09-17· cited 142×
- United States v. Louis RochesterFifth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 137×
- United States v. Rex K. Degeorge, AKA Rex Karageorge Degeorge, Rex Karageorgiou Degeorge, Angelos George Karageorgiou, Angelos George KarageorgeNinth Circuit· 2004-08-30· cited 113×
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsNinth Circuit· 2004-05-06· cited 107×
- Blanton v. AnzaloneNinth Circuit· 1987-04-09· cited 91×
- United States v. Melinda BaranyNinth Circuit· 1989-09-07· cited 90×
- United States v. Grace A. AnglinNinth Circuit· 2000-06-07· cited 81×
- United States v. SchletteNinth Circuit· 1988-03-31· cited 79×
- United States v. William H. RandleSeventh Circuit· 2003-04-01· cited 78×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Harold STODDARD, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-07-30· cited 74×
- Blanton v. AnzaloneNinth Circuit· 1985-05-14· cited 72×
- GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. ASTARTE DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICE, ASTARTE Astarte Davis, AppellantThird Circuit· 1994-12-13· cited 70×
- United States v. Jo Lynn PattyTenth Circuit· 1993-04-27· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.