· 2/13/2012
United States v. Yeung
Citations
- 672 F.3d 594
- 2012 WL 432289
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that federal rules of evidence not applicable to restitution hearing and no error to admit hearsay
- holding that federal rules of evidence not applicable to restitution hearing and no error to admit hearsay
- reasoning that, where a successor lender pays only a fraction of the outstanding principal balance, awarding restitution based on that balance would overcompensate and constitute plain error
- noting that a “direct lender’s losses may also be reduced by amounts recouped from resale of the loan”
- noting that the value of a mortgage on the secondary market may vary with the market value of the property, the credit rating of the borrower, and other market conditions
- Calculation rules “require some adjustment ... where the victim is the loan purchaser as opposed to the loan originator.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Graber, Ikuta, Quist, Sandra, Susan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.