Skip to main content
· 12/13/1994

GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. ASTARTE DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICE, ASTARTE Astarte Davis, Appellant

Citations

  • 43 F.3d 41
  • 31 V.I. 332
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 38155
  • 1994 WL 696720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that restitution under the VWPA was more akin to compensation for actual loss than a criminal penalty that may not bear interest
  • concluding that an award of restitution pursuant to VWPA cannot include litigation costs to recover balance of funds in bank accounts because such expenses are too far removed from the underlying criminal conduct
  • allowing prejudgement interest where the embezzled cash came from “the estate of James Merrills Rice”
  • allowing prejudgement interest where the embezzled cash came from \the estate of James Merrills Rice\
  • allowing prejudgment interest on restitution order \to effect full compensation\ for the victim's actual loss
  • seemingly endorsing, in a single paragraph, both but for and direct causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansmann, Hutchinson, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.