· 8/30/2004
United States v. Rex K. Degeorge, AKA Rex Karageorge Degeorge, Rex Karageorgiou Degeorge, Angelos George Karageorgiou, Angelos George Karageorge
Citations
- 380 F.3d 1203
- 65 Fed. R. Serv. 258
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding admission, under category two, of the fact of (but not certain details about
- restitution orders are unaffected by Blakely because restitution determinations “are quite different from sentencing determinations under the Sentencing Guidelines”
- “Because we conclude that the attomey’s fees incurred in the civil case were a direct result of DeGeorge’s criminal conduct, we affirm the district court’s restitution award.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Gibson, Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.