Skip to main content
· 10/24/2006

United States v. Beydoun

Citations

  • 469 F.3d 102
  • 71 Fed. R. Serv. 717
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26434
  • 2006 WL 3012861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • foreclosing the attempt to apply the Confrontation Clause to sentencing hearings
  • “[W]e conclude that there is no Crawford violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Reavley, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.