Supreme Court· 1/19/2010
Presley v. Georgia
Citations
- 558 U.S. 209
- 130 S. Ct. 721
- 175 L. Ed. 2d 675
- 2010 U.S. LEXIS 761
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court impermissibly closed voir dire to family members because it failed to consider all reasonable alternatives to that closure
- holding that these standards apply before excluding the public from any stage of a criminal trial
- recognizing that “trial courts are required to consider alternatives to elosure[,] even when they are not offered by the parties”
- recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
- recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
- holding that no part of the trial process is exempt from the public trial guarantee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
343 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson CountyTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 1,134×
- People v. AllgierColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-08-23· cited 779×
- People v. VaughnMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-09· cited 734×
- Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 717×
- State v. SublettWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 310×
- People v. VirgilCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-30· cited 276×
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 231×
- Stackhouse v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-06-29· cited 222×
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-10-28· cited 220×
- People v. E.O.California Court of Appeal· 2010-09-29· cited 166×
- Downs v. LapeSecond Circuit· 2011-09-14· cited 161×
- United States v. WithersNinth Circuit· 2010-08-19· cited 140×
- Martez Bickham v. Thomas WinnSixth Circuit· 2018-04-23· cited 132×
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
- State v. Wilks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-02-17· cited 116×
- State v. PaumierWashington Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 115×
- Jeremias v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-01· cited 114×
- People v. OrlewiczMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-06-14· cited 102×
- Bucci v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2011-10-13· cited 99×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Ayala v. SpeckardSecond Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 117×
- Abdeslem v. United States EmbassySupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 23×
- Presley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-03-23· cited 20×
- United States v. HaleySupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 8×
- Presley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.