Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/19/2010

Presley v. Georgia

Citations

  • 558 U.S. 209
  • 130 S. Ct. 721
  • 175 L. Ed. 2d 675
  • 2010 U.S. LEXIS 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court impermissibly closed voir dire to family members because it failed to consider all reasonable alternatives to that closure
  • holding that these standards apply before excluding the public from any stage of a criminal trial
  • recognizing that “trial courts are required to consider alternatives to elosure[,] even when they are not offered by the parties”
  • recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
  • recognizing that safety concerns and threats could certainly be concrete enough reasons to warrant closing a trial
  • holding that no part of the trial process is exempt from the public trial guarantee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

343 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.