Skip to main content
· 11/2/1992

United States v. Innocent U. Uwaeme

Citations

  • 975 F.2d 1016
  • 1992 WL 220161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding accuracy is important but mathematical precision is not required when determining reasonable approximation of drug quantity for sentencing
  • noting that this court must give substan- tial deference to a district court's credibility determinations
  • noting that federal courts do not require scientific certainty in determining the chemical composition of an alleged controlled substance
  • noting that district court can use large sums of money seized from defendant to determine amount of drugs at sentencing
  • noting government must prove every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt, including, in drug cases, the chemical make-up of the drug
  • permitting court to adopt rough approximation of drug weight, although it “do[es] not approach scientific or statistical accuracy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Hamilton, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.