D.C. Circuit· 6/13/2008

United States v. Law

Citations

528 F.3d 888
381 U.S. App. D.C. 270
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12565
2008 WL 2388650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Confrontation Clause was not violated where the expert witness “did not relate statements by out-of-court declar-ants to the jury,” but based his conclusion on his experience as a narcotics investigator
noting that transactions engaged in for present personal benefit and not to create appearance of legitimate wealth generally do not violate money laundering statutes
explaining that the Government could satisfy its burden of proving a conviction by producing the Judgment and Commitment Order
holding government officials may rely on assurance of authority to consent to search “if objective circumstances make reliance reasonable”
observing that the district court had applied the four-level enhancement at the original sentencing
observing that a defendant has the right to appear at an evidentiary suppression hearing guaranteed by the Due Process Clause but does not have the right to appear at a suppression motion that addresses only legal issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Brown, Kavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Law

18 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.