First Circuit· 1/12/2006

United States v. Hall

Citations

434 F.3d 42
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 681
2006 WL 60959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that sentencing court did not err by using defendant’s overall drug profits as a basis for estimating drug quantity under relevant conduct guideline
noting that a forfeiture money judgment is equivalent to a civil judgment, though that issue was not directly before the court
holding that criminal forfeiture is a \sanction against the individual defendant\
acknowledging that where a court imposes a general dollar- figure judgment, “the government may seize future assets to satisfy the order”
noting that a forfeiture money judgment is equivalent to a civil judgment, though that issue was not directly before the court
noting that § 1956 criminalizes transactions that conceal the source of drug proceeds “even if the defendant does not conceal his own identity in the process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.