Second Circuit· 2/6/2008
United States v. Pepin
Citations
- 514 F.3d 193
- 75 Fed. R. Serv. 817
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553
- 2008 WL 313806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that courts “generally do not consider issues raised in a reply brief for the first time” because the nonmovant “may not have an adequate opportunity to respond”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BashamFourth Circuit· 2009-03-30· cited 220×
- United States v. Al-MoayadSecond Circuit· 2008-10-02· cited 165×
- United States v. DupreeSecond Circuit· 2013-01-28· cited 112×
- United States v. WhittenSecond Circuit· 2010-06-30· cited 99×
- United States v. FellSecond Circuit· 2008-06-27· cited 93×
- People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-08-29· cited 45×
- United States v. GabrionSixth Circuit· 2011-08-03· cited 30×
- United States v. LujanTenth Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 29×
- United States v. JacquesSecond Circuit· 2012-07-09· cited 19×
- United States v. MorganSecond Circuit· 2015-05-19· cited 16×
- Palin v. New York Times Co.Second Circuit· 2024-08-28· cited 15×
- United States v. MonsalvatgeSecond Circuit· 2017-03-08· cited 12×
- Pierre v. Planet Automotive, Inc.E.D. New York· 2016-06-21· cited 9×
- United States v. GarnesSecond Circuit· 2024-05-28· cited 9×
- United States v. Johneak JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 2024-01-05· cited 7×
- Matter of Daily News, L.P. v. WileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-03-12· cited 5×
- United States v. Abu-JihaadD. Connecticut· 2008-02-21· cited 4×
- United States v. TaverasE.D. New York· 2008-11-04· cited 3×
- United States v. WilsonSecond Circuit· 2010-06-30
- Casiano v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-06-09
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Second Circuit· 1998-05-29· cited 1,181×
- United States v. McVeighTenth Circuit· 1998-09-08· cited 303×
- Mary Ann Luciano v. The Olsten Corporation Frank N. Liguori Gordon J. Bingham Martin GelermanSecond Circuit· 1997-03-21· cited 245×
- United States v. SalamehSecond Circuit· 1998-08-04· cited 182×
- United States v. Orlando Cordia Hall, Also Known as LanFifth Circuit· 1998-10-01· cited 177×
- United States v. Carol BirneySecond Circuit· 1982-08-09· cited 143×
- Hogue v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1997-12-12· cited 115×
- United States v. Darryl Lamont JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-03· cited 107×
- In Re Robert E. Harris, Debtor, Robert E. Harris, Albany County Office, Mark Swimelar, TrusteeSecond Circuit· 2006-09-18· cited 95×
- United States v. Donald FellSecond Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 85×
- Joan S. Borawick v. Morrie Shay and Christine ShaySecond Circuit· 1995-10-17· cited 83×
- United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul RodriguezSecond Circuit· 1994-02-17· cited 81×
- United States v. Pierce S. HanSecond Circuit· 2000-10-31· cited 80×
- Charles E. McDowell v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 1997-11-24· cited 73×
Other cases named United States v. Pepin
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.