Skip to main content
· 2/6/2008

United States v. Pepin

Citations

  • 514 F.3d 193
  • 75 Fed. R. Serv. 817
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2553
  • 2008 WL 313806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that courts “generally do not consider issues raised in a reply brief for the first time” because the nonmovant “may not have an adequate opportunity to respond”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Calabresi, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.