Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/9/2012

United States v. Jacques

Citations

  • 684 F.3d 324
  • 2012 WL 2687945
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when an informant asked clarifying questions about the defendant’s role in a plan to tamper with a witness, it did not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation
  • holding that no violation of the right to counsel occurred when a friend of the defendant cooperated with the FBI in speaking to the defendant through a series of monitored phone calls and the friend asked no more than a few questions that were not of “a probing nature”
  • upholding the exclusion of evidence of prior alleged acts of sexual assault when there was “murkiness … with regard to whether, or how much, coercion was involved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Chin, Droney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.