United States v. Pierce S. Han

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding error of excluding character evidence on the defendant’s character to form intent was harmless because the defendant testified as to intent and the jury had direct evidence
• “Thus, Rule 404(a)(1) requires only that the proffered evidence of a character trait relate to some element at issue in the case.”
• ʺ§ 2423(b) criminalizes crossing state lines with a criminal intentʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).