United States v. Orlando Cordia Hall, Also Known as Lan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this is con- stitutional, and suggesting that it is also correct as a matter of statutory interpretation
• holding that capital defendant has no constitutional right to make an unsworn statement of remorse to the jury that is not subject to cross-examination
• holding Constitution affords no right to make unsworn statement of remorse before the jury that is not subject to cross examination
• holding Constitution affords no right to make unsworn statement of remorse before the jury that is not subject to cross examination
• holding no disqualifying bias arose where a capital murder venire member stated she was uncertain whether she could consider the fact a defendant grew up in a dysfunctional family environment as a mitigating factor
• noting that a “superseding indictment containing capital charges was returned on November 22, 1994”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).