Skip to main content
· 12/7/2009

United States v. Paroline

Citations

  • 672 F. Supp. 2d 781
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113443
  • 2009 WL 4572786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the amount of restitution was not subject to calculation because the Government did not establish any specific losses proximately caused by the defendant’s possession of the victim’s images

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leonard Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.