· 12/7/2009
United States v. Paroline
Citations
- 672 F. Supp. 2d 781
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113443
- 2009 WL 4572786
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the amount of restitution was not subject to calculation because the Government did not establish any specific losses proximately caused by the defendant’s possession of the victim’s images
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leonard Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.