· 3/22/2011
United States v. Amy Unknown
Citations
- 636 F.3d 190
- 2011 WL 988882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the district court may \quantify the amount of restitution to which Amy is entitled or the fraction attributable to [the defendant] Paroline....\
- stating that the district court may “quantify the amount of restitution to which Amy is entitled or the fraction attributable to [the defendant] Paroline.... ”
- \Comparing these statutes reveals that Congress abandoned the proximate causation language. . . .\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Jolly, Garza
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.