Skip to main content
· 3/22/2011

United States v. Amy Unknown

Citations

  • 636 F.3d 190
  • 2011 WL 988882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the district court may \quantify the amount of restitution to which Amy is entitled or the fraction attributable to [the defendant] Paroline....\
  • stating that the district court may “quantify the amount of restitution to which Amy is entitled or the fraction attributable to [the defendant] Paroline.... ”
  • \Comparing these statutes reveals that Congress abandoned the proximate causation language. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Jolly, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.