United States v. Richard C. Crandon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, without analysis, that § 2259 requires damages for losses suffered “as a proximate result of the offense”
• upholding a three-year total Internet ban where the offender used the Internet to solicit sex from a minor
• stating, without analysis, that § 2259 requires damages for losses suffered “as a proximate result of the offense”
• stating, without analysis, that § 2259 requires damages for losses suffered “as a proximate result of the offense”
• stating, without analysis, that § 2259 requires damages for losses suffered “as a proximate result of the offense”
• upholding restrictions on employment and internet use against constitutional challenge when conditions were narrowly tailored and related to relevant § 3553 factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).