United States v. Maturin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an error resulting in an overstated restitution award affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings
• concluding that an error was clear and obvious when it conflicted with “plain statutory language” even though we “ha[d] never expressly determined” the issue
• holding that an error resulting in the overstatement of a restitution award affected substantial rights because it affected the outcome of the district court proceedings
• noting that 3 Joe’s attorney appeared by video at his rearraignment. 6 Case: 21-10206 Document: 00516273249 Page: 7 Date Filed: 04/08/2022 No. 21-10206 § 3663(a)(3
• finding that an error affected the defendant’s substantial rights where he was required to pay $100,000 more than the proven losses
• applying plain error review when a defendant does not object to the restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).