United States v. Eddie Eugene Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that it may be \impossible to determine whether child pornographers or consumers of child pornography were initially responsible for the creation of the child pornography industry.... Neither could exist without the other.\
• \[T]here is no sense in distinguishing ... between the producers and the consumers of child pornography. Neither could exist without the other.\
• “[T]here is no sense in distinguishing ... between the producers and the consumers of child pornography. Neither could exist without the other.”
• the primary victim of receiving child pornography is the child portrayed
• consulting dictionary for definition of “victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).