Fifth Circuit· 10/1/2012
United States v. Michael Wright
Citations
- 697 F.3d 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a party seeking a stay from a denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity should be able to establish irreparable injury
- “Because nothing in the CVRA suggests that Congress intended to grant crime victims the right to an appeal or otherwise vary the historical rule that crime victims do not have the right of appeal, we conclude that the CVRA grants crime victims only mandamus review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, King, Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Garza, Dennis, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Doyle ParolineFifth Circuit· 2012-11-19· cited 54×
- United States v. Christopher LaranetaSeventh Circuit· 2012-11-14· cited 46×
- United States v. Ronald SlovacekFifth Circuit· 2012-10-10· cited 5×
- Amy & Vicky v. United States District Court for the Western DistrictNinth Circuit· 2012-10-24· cited 2×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1952-01-07· cited 3,056×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2003-11-12· cited 1,983×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 1,395×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 1,163×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 876×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 843×
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-21· cited 797×
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court· 1995-06-05· cited 697×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.