Skip to main content
· 10/21/2005

United States v. Pepper Sue Hinson

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 114
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22729
  • 2005 WL 2687081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because revocation is discretionary, Booker’s Sixth Amendment concerns “do not exist with regard to sentences imposed when supervised release is revoked”
  • holding that revocation of supervised release is not part of a criminal prosecution and therefore does not require a jury trial or proof beyond a reasonable doubt under the Sixth Amendment
  • relying on Booker dicta for this conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Dennis, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.