United States v. Jeffrey Szakacs, Daniel Spanley, John M. Neff, Tyrone Noble and Brian Baloski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a defendant who steals a firearm and then . . . robs the liquor store down the street . . . could receive an enhancement”
• “Because nearly every federal weapons offense could be simultaneously charged as a state crime, allowing the state crime to count as ‘another felony offense’ renders that term superfluous; it could just as easily read ‘any felony offense.’ ”
• “Because almost every weapons crime could also be charged as a state law offense, [the district court’s] reading of the guideline would lead to a routine four-level enhancement and defeat the purpose behind the structure to the Guidelines.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).