United States v. Ronda Nixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, however, that Fed. R. Evid. 704 does not prohibit experts from opining on “ultimate issues”
• “[T]he simple act of printing out the electronically stored records does not change their status for admissibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).