Sixth Circuit· 4/7/2010
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 601 F.3d 530
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7145
- 2010 WL 1330142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t [was not] inappropriate for [an officer] to check both whether [the driver and passenger] had valid identification and whether they had any outstanding warrants.”
- where driving a car owned by an absent third party was one among several factors contributing to reasonable suspicion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Siler, Rogers, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wooten v. CauleySixth Circuit· 2012-04-12· cited 216×
- Brace v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2011-03-15· cited 159×
- United States v. Kwame KilpatrickSixth Circuit· 2015-08-14· cited 127×
- United States v. HowardSixth Circuit· 2010-09-14· cited 118×
- Catrena Green v. Adam ThrockmortonSixth Circuit· 2012-06-13· cited 117×
- United States v. Russell CollinsSixth Circuit· 2015-08-24· cited 117×
- United States v. Melvin SkinnerSixth Circuit· 2012-08-14· cited 88×
- United States v. HamSixth Circuit· 2011-01-07· cited 58×
- Wilson v. RoyFifth Circuit· 2011-06-13· cited 50×
- United States v. GrossSixth Circuit· 2011-06-15· cited 50×
- Abilio Hernandez v. Jason BolesSixth Circuit· 2020-01-30· cited 34×
- United States v. GrossSixth Circuit· 2010-10-19· cited 27×
- United States v. PrinceSixth Circuit· 2010-08-29· cited 24×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 14×
- United States v. Adorno-MolinaFirst Circuit· 2014-12-19· cited 12×
- United States v. Maurice Duncan BurksSixth Circuit· 2020-09-04· cited 7×
- United States v. Sherman MitchellD.C. Circuit· 2016-03-08· cited 6×
- James Henry Perozzo v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-07-09· cited 1×
- United States v. CollazoM.D. Tennessee· 2014-08-06· cited 1×
- United States v. GossW.D. Michigan· 2012-02-08· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 812×
- United States v. WhiteSixth Circuit· 2007-06-11· cited 268×
- United States v. Luis Lopez-MedinaSixth Circuit· 2006-08-25· cited 250×
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Sixth Circuit· 2003-07-22· cited 177×
- United States v. VasquezSixth Circuit· 2009-03-23· cited 171×
- United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)Sixth Circuit· 1992-01-08· cited 144×
- United States v. J.D. Ashworth, A/K/A James Daniel Ashworth (86-6235) and Scott Ashworth, A/K/A Samuel Scott Ashworth (86-6236)Sixth Circuit· 1988-01-04· cited 139×
- United States v. Sylvester Townsend and David GreenSixth Circuit· 2002-09-27· cited 120×
- United States v. John E. ScalesSixth Circuit· 1979-05-14· cited 101×
- United States v. Jessie Jones, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 1997-03-12· cited 99×
- United States v. Malcolm Earl ThomasSixth Circuit· 1996-01-16· cited 94×
- United States v. Michael D. JohnsonSixth Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 93×
- United States v. Domingo Laboy Cruz, Maximino Bonifacio, Also Known as NerySecond Circuit· 1992-12-21· cited 86×
- United States v. BellSixth Circuit· 2009-02-17· cited 78×
- United States v. VasilakosSixth Circuit· 2007-11-21· cited 77×
- United States v. KrattSixth Circuit· 2009-09-02· cited 62×
- United States v. Danna Yvonne Bender (99-6230) and David E. Culliver (99-6236)Sixth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 61×
- United States v. Doyle E. Campbell, Doyle E. Campbell, M.D., Inc., an Ohio CorporationSixth Circuit· 1988-04-12· cited 50×
- United States v. WimbleySixth Circuit· 2009-01-28· cited 46×
- United States v. MartinSixth Circuit· 2008-03-31· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.