United States v. Kelsor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that errors in the § 851 information did not deprive the defendant “of reasonable notice or a meaningful opportunity to be heard,” and noting that the defendant did not contest the validity of the predicate conviction itself
• noting that fees are only recoverable only “to the extent the [lawyer] performs work traditionally done by an attorney”
• explaining that the threshold for finding personal knowledge under Federal Rule of Evidence 602 is low
• one firearm located in the bed and another in a closet where the drugs and drug paraphernalia were stored

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).