United States v. Quentin Sherer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “Speedy Trial Act excludes delay caused by a continuance ‘that [serves] the ends of justice’ and ‘outweigh[s] the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.’”
• stating on direct review that the defendant’s DNA evidence found on a pair of gloves, a t-shirt, and a knit cap found near the crime in combination with other circumstantial evidence was enough to sustain a conviction
• “A court need only consider alleged delay which occurs prior to and including the date on which the motion [to dismiss] is made [and the] right to challenge any subsequent delay is waived unless the defendant brings a new motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).