United States v. Marks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentencing court was not required to deduct amount of drugs defendant personally consumed because each pill “was acquired with the intent that it would or could be distributed”
• holding that drugs the defendant consumed were nonetheless attributable to him because he had acquired them \with the intent that [they] would or could be distributed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Hall
  First Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 92×
• United States v. Cruz-Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 2008-09-08· cited 77×
• United States v. Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 2008-05-13· cited 66×
• United States v. Jones
  First Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 53×
• United States v. Bell
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-12-21· cited 52×
• United States v. Morgan
  First Circuit· 2004-09-03· cited 42×
• United States v. Green
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-06-18· cited 42×
• United States v. Rodríguez-Durán
  First Circuit· 2007-11-21· cited 39×
• United States v. Demers
  First Circuit· 2016-11-16· cited 34×
• United States v. Sanchez-Badillo
  First Circuit· 2008-08-27· cited 33×
• United States v. Vidal-Reyes
  First Circuit· 2009-04-03· cited 32×
• United States v. Jaca-Nazario
  First Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 23×
• United States v. Crudup
  First Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 21×
• United States v. Monteiro
  First Circuit· 2005-08-09· cited 21×
• United States v. Rodriguez-Duran
  First Circuit· 2007-11-21· cited 21×
• United States v. Ford
  First Circuit· 2023-07-12· cited 2×
• United States v. Nicolella
  First Circuit· 2007-01-12· cited 1×
• Re-Ace, Inc. v. Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc.
  D. Puerto Rico· 2004-11-04· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino
  First Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
• United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David Sklar
  First Circuit· 1990-12-03· cited 220×
• United States v. Robert F. Carrozza, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca
  First Circuit· 1993-11-22· cited 115×
• United States v. Dean Kipp
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-12-02· cited 74×
• United States v. Santos
  First Circuit· 2004-02-12· cited 72×
• United States v. Matthew L. Wyss
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-07-21· cited 72×
• United States v. Christopher Gill
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-10-31· cited 59×
• United States v. Jimenez-Perez
  First Circuit· 1989-03-06· cited 42×
• United States v. Reyes-Echevarria
  First Circuit· 2003-09-22· cited 39×
• United States v. Rodriguez
  First Circuit· 2003-07-21· cited 32×
• United States v. Timothy Williams
  Second Circuit· 2001-04-18· cited 28×
• United States v. Janice Kay Fraser
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 25×
• United States v. Jansen
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-08-22· cited 1×