United States v. Robert F. Carrozza, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that instructions published by Sentencing Commission in informational booklet are not meant to bind the courts or the parties in any given case
• finding -13- no prejudice where defendant argued his Guidelines range \might\ have been different had the district court not erred and the district court's calculation was \in all likelihood\ correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).