Sixth Circuit· 10/31/2003

United States v. Christopher Gill

Citations

348 F.3d 147
62 Fed. R. Serv. 1021
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22423
2003 F. App'x 0384P

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding any error as to drug amount harmless where “the sentence either way is subject to the same guideline range”
stating that “the district court’s findings must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence”
noting that “[p]ossessing drugs for personal use was not part of or connected to the commission of, preparation for, or concealment of the distribution-type offense,” without explanation
excluding purported amount for personal use yielded two-level difference in offense level
“A defendant is responsible for all drug quantities that are included within the scope of his ‘relevant conduct.’”
“A defendant is responsible for all drug quantities that are included within the scope of his ‘relevant conduct.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Clay, Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.