United States v. Vidal-Reyes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court had authority to consider statutory minimum for identity theft, 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, when imposing sentence for non- predicate crimes charged in the same indictment
• assuming without deciding that the government may charge the defendant with violating § 1028A without charging the predicate offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).