United States v. Jimenez-Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the jury's disbelief of defendants' story allows legitimate inference \that the fabrication was all the more proof of their guilt\
• noting that the Government need not \'preclude every reasonable hypothesis inconsistent with guilt' in order to sustain a conviction\ (quoting United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir. 1985))
• specifying that willfulness is an element of the ___ ___ offense
• deeming it “apodictic that a trier of fact is not bound to accept' the self-serving stories of persons accused”
• if jury disbelieved defendant’s story, “it could legitimately have presumed that the fabrication was all the more proof of ... guilt”
• the jury could legitimately have presumed that the fabrication was all the more proof of [defendants] guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Jimenez-Perez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Jimenez-Perez
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-10-18· cited 11×