Seventh Circuit· 2/2/1995
United States v. Mark D. Goad
Citations
- 44 F.3d 580
- 1995 WL 7487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that confusion about the sentencing guidelines was insufficient to show a lack of communication
- despite pro se litigant's extensive experience, court recommended Goad against proceeding pro se
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Cummings, Ferguson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. IreyEleventh Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 1,965×
- United States v. William EskridgeSeventh Circuit· 2006-04-19· cited 156×
- United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-BautistaSeventh Circuit· 2000-08-21· cited 104×
- United States v. James OreyeSeventh Circuit· 2001-08-24· cited 85×
- United States v. Abraham P. Flagg, Also Known as Abraham WillsSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-23· cited 77×
- United States v. Rosivito HoskinsSeventh Circuit· 2001-03-21· cited 52×
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2002-06-27· cited 41×
- United States v. Floyd Loyd, Also Known as L. MorrisSeventh Circuit· 1995-09-05· cited 39×
- Matter of Adoption of JSPLNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-05-31· cited 38×
- United States v. Anthony PrattSeventh Circuit· 1995-04-13· cited 36×
- United States v. Stephen GoldenSeventh Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 36×
- United States v. Michael S. ElkinsSeventh Circuit· 1999-05-12· cited 31×
- Muskat v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2009-01-29· cited 29×
- United States v. Brian FordSeventh Circuit· 2015-08-20· cited 29×
- United States v. Lorenzo MosleySeventh Circuit· 2014-07-16· cited 28×
- United States v. Luis Sanchez-Estrada and Federico VargasSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-11· cited 22×
- United States v. JonesSeventh Circuit· 2017-06-30· cited 17×
- M.L.L. v. WessmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-05-31· cited 10×
- State v. TooleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-23· cited 4×
- Endres v. Indiana State PoliceIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-27· cited 3×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,843×
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzSeventh Circuit· 1991-03-15· cited 666×
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 376×
- United States v. Willie L. DavisSeventh Circuit· 1979-08-03· cited 129×
- James Edward Wilks v. Thomas Israel, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonSeventh Circuit· 1980-07-22· cited 114×
- Hillsberg v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-05-04· cited 106×
- United States v. Pedro Gomez, Fernando Magana, and Rigoberto VelaSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-16· cited 96×
- United States v. Earl HillsbergSeventh Circuit· 1987-05-04· cited 91×
- United States v. Jerome ZillgesSeventh Circuit· 1992-10-27· cited 75×
- United States v. Clifford OlsonSeventh Circuit· 1988-05-09· cited 66×
- Medical Malpractice Insurance Ass'n v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 61×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Daniel J. Kleba v. Kenneth McGinnisSeventh Circuit· 1986-07-21· cited 60×
- United States v. Eugene MorrisSeventh Circuit· 1983-07-11· cited 58×
- United States v. Leland L. StudleySeventh Circuit· 1989-12-14· cited 56×
- United States v. Bruce RothSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-06· cited 48×
- United States v. Jerome R. Dillard, Also Known as Carl WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 1990-11-01· cited 46×
- United States v. William Colonia and Fanny AlvarezSeventh Circuit· 1989-04-27· cited 43×
- United States v. Jimmy Lee ChurchSeventh Circuit· 1992-08-12· cited 41×
- United States v. Ronald MitchellSeventh Circuit· 1986-04-16· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.