· 4/13/1995
United States v. Anthony Pratt
Citations
- 52 F.3d 671
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8631
- 1995 WL 217411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “where hearsay evidence is reliable, [the Seventh Circuit] has been reluctant to find a due process violation” at revocation hearings where the accused is unable to cross-examine the declarant
- affirming revocation based on hearsay evidence because the “district court could find that [the] hearsay testimony was reliable” and “the government could have shown good cause why the witnesses need not be present”
- “a revocation hearing is not part of a criminal prosecution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pell, Flaum, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.