Skip to main content
· 4/13/1995

United States v. Anthony Pratt

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 671
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8631
  • 1995 WL 217411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “where hearsay evidence is reliable, [the Seventh Circuit] has been reluctant to find a due process violation” at revocation hearings where the accused is unable to cross-examine the declarant
  • affirming revocation based on hearsay evidence because the “district court could find that [the] hearsay testimony was reliable” and “the government could have shown good cause why the witnesses need not be present”
  • “a revocation hearing is not part of a criminal prosecution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pell, Flaum, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.